Speaker summary
⁠72%1 analyzed article/video77.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Christopher Clay-Freeman results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 83.6% saturation with 97 hits. Analysis detected 253.25 faulty-reasoning hits from 77.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 25.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠41% (16,405 of 27,710 speakers). This Christopher Clay-Freeman is better (less manipulative) than 59.20% of the peer group.
Christopher Clay-Freeman
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠41%Christopher Clay-Freeman (selected)26%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 77.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

41% percentile
025507510040.8% percentile
25.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos77.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 83.6%83.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 44.0%44.0%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Speaker 27.6%27.6%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 17.2%17.2%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 13.8%13.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 19.8%19.8%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 8.6%8.6%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 7.8%7.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 7.8%7.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 21.6%21.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Anecdotal: Speaker 83.6%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 44.0%, sitewide 8.1%Red Herring: Speaker 27.6%, sitewide 0.7%Negativity Bias: Speaker 21.6%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 19.8%, sitewide 9.1%False Dilemma: Speaker 17.2%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Speaker 13.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 2.2%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos