Speaker summary
⁠77%1 analyzed article/video129 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Christopher Chen results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Begging the Question, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 37.5% saturation with 72 hits. Analysis detected 316 faulty-reasoning hits from 129 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 26.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠43% (16,310 of 28,364 speakers). This Christopher Chen is better (less manipulative) than 57.50% of the peer group.
Christopher Chen
Speaker details
Total words: 129
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

43% percentile
025507510042.5% percentile
26.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos129 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 54.5%54.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 37.5%37.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 18.8%18.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 18.8%18.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 34.4%34.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 26.0%26.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 15.2%15.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 5.2%5.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Begging the Question: Speaker 54.5%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 37.5%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 34.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 26.0%, sitewide 11.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 18.8%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 18.8%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Speaker 15.2%, sitewide 1.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 8.1%Begging the QuestionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos