Speaker summary
⁠76%1 analyzed article/video66.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Christophe Fouquet results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Halo Effect, and Optimism Bias, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 50 hits. Analysis detected 174 faulty-reasoning hits from 66.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 44.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (10,937 of 28,364 speakers). This Christophe Fouquet is worse (more manipulative) than 61.40% of the peer group.
Christophe Fouquet
Speaker details
Total words: 66.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

61% percentile
025507510061.4% percentile
44.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos66.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 65.5%65.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 46.0%46.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 38.5%38.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 23.0%23.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 65.5%, sitewide 11.1%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 46.0%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Speaker 38.5%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 23.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos