Speaker summary
⁠56%1 analyzed article/video84 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Christina Selander-Bouzouina results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 58.7% saturation with 55.5 hits. Analysis detected 223.125 faulty-reasoning hits from 84 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 33.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠53% (13,512 of 28,364 speakers). This Christina Selander-Bouzouina is worse (more manipulative) than 52.40% of the peer group.
Christina Selander-Bouzouina
Speaker details
Total words: 84
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

52% percentile
025507510052.4% percentile
33.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos84 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 58.7%58.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 44.0%44.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 29.4%29.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 29.4%29.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 20.6%20.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 20.6%20.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 58.7%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 44.0%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 29.4%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 29.4%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Speaker 20.6%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Speaker 20.6%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos