Speaker summary
⁠67%1 analyzed article/video478.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Christian Mitchell results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 26.7% saturation with 155.267 hits. Analysis detected 1,572.221 faulty-reasoning hits from 478.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠10% (25,575 of 28,364 speakers). This Christian Mitchell is better (less manipulative) than 90.20% of the peer group.
Christian Mitchell
Speaker details
Total words: 478.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

10% percentile
02550751009.8% percentile
9.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos478.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 9.4%9.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 23.1%23.1%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 15.1%15.1%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 14.3%14.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 12.7%12.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 26.7%26.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 8.9%8.9%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 7.1%7.1%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Speaker 7.1%7.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 10.0%10.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 9.4%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 26.7%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 24.0%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 23.1%, sitewide 8.1%Ad Hominem: Speaker 15.1%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 12.7%, sitewide 0.8%Optimism Bias: Speaker 10.1%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 10.0%, sitewide 3.7%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 9.1%Indoctrination: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 2.2%Anecdotal: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 7.5%False Dilemma: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 0.0%Red Herring: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 0.7%In-Group Bias: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 6.9%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Loss Aversion: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 2.5%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 0.2%Middle Ground: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 0.1%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos