Speaker summary
⁠98%1 analyzed article/video60 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Christan Braswell results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 60 hits. Analysis detected 225 faulty-reasoning hits from 60 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 65% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (6,437 of 28,364 speakers). This Christan Braswell is worse (more manipulative) than 77.30% of the peer group.
Christan Braswell
Speaker details
Total words: 60
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

77% percentile
025507510077.3% percentile
65.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos60 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Ad Hominem: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Straw Man: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.9%Ad HominemSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos