Speaker summary
⁠49%1 analyzed article/video427.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chriselle Lim results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Anecdotal, and Representativeness Heuristic, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 15.9% saturation with 114 hits. Analysis detected 730.34 faulty-reasoning hits from 427.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠6% (26,659 of 28,364 speakers). This Chriselle Lim is better (less manipulative) than 94.00% of the peer group.
Chriselle Lim
Speaker details
Total words: 427.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

6% percentile
02550751006.0% percentile
7.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos427.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 5.6%5.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 15.9%15.9%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 9.8%9.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 8.5%8.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 7.0%7.0%Middle GroundSitewide 0.1%Speaker 6.1%6.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 5.6%5.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 21.7%21.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 2.6%2.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 21.7%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 15.9%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 11.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 1.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 8.1%False Dilemma: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 1.5%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 5.3%Middle Ground: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 0.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Personal Incredulity: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos