Speaker summary
⁠72%1 analyzed article/video70.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chrisandra Flores results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Bandwagon, and Appeal to Authority, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 37.7% saturation with 26.667 hits. Analysis detected 150.917 faulty-reasoning hits from 70.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 20.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠34% (18,847 of 28,364 speakers). This Chrisandra Flores is better (less manipulative) than 66.40% of the peer group.
Chrisandra Flores
Speaker details
Total words: 70.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

34% percentile
025507510033.6% percentile
20.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos70.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 37.7%37.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 17.9%17.9%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Speaker 18.9%18.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 19.8%19.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 28.3%28.3%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 13.2%13.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 13.2%13.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 17.9%17.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Indoctrination: Speaker 37.7%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 28.3%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 19.8%, sitewide 3.7%Bandwagon: Speaker 18.9%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 17.9%, sitewide 11.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 17.9%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 13.2%, sitewide 5.3%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 13.2%, sitewide 2.2%IndoctrinationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos