Speaker summary
⁠71%1 analyzed article/video102 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chris Sabatini results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Appeal to Authority, and Negativity Bias, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 75.7% saturation with 56 hits. Analysis detected 224 faulty-reasoning hits from 102 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 51.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (8,131 of 28,364 speakers). This Chris Sabatini is worse (more manipulative) than 71.30% of the peer group.
Chris Sabatini
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠72%Chris Sabatini (selected)52%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 102
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

71% percentile
025507510071.3% percentile
51.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos102 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 75.7%75.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 43.1%43.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 43.1%43.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 43.1%43.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 75.7%, sitewide 7.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 43.1%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 43.1%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 43.1%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos