Speaker summary
⁠35%3 analyzed articles/videos212.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chris Reykdal results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Begging the Question, Pessimism Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 21.9% saturation with 74 hits. Analysis detected 398 faulty-reasoning hits from 212.333 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 12.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠17% (23,551 of 28,364 speakers). This Chris Reykdal is better (less manipulative) than 83.00% of the peer group.
Chris Reykdal
Speaker details
Total words: 212.333
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

17% percentile
025507510017.0% percentile
12.5% BS Score3 analyzed videos212.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 21.9%21.9%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 20.4%20.4%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 18.3%18.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 17.8%17.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 9.5%9.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 8.9%8.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 11.7%11.7%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 5.0%5.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 8.6%8.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 3.0%3.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Indoctrination: Speaker 21.9%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Speaker 20.4%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 18.3%, sitewide 1.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 17.8%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 11.7%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 11.1%False Dilemma: Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 0.8%IndoctrinationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos