Speaker summary
⁠78%1 analyzed article/video209.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chris Drummond results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, In-Group Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 34.2% saturation with 71.694 hits. Analysis detected 564.21 faulty-reasoning hits from 209.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠14% (24,578 of 28,364 speakers). This Chris Drummond is better (less manipulative) than 86.70% of the peer group.
Chris Drummond
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠14%Chris Drummond (selected)11%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 209.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

13% percentile
025507510013.3% percentile
10.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos209.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 2.3%2.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 27.2%27.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 27.7%27.7%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 20.9%20.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 34.3%34.3%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Speaker 14.1%14.1%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 11.9%11.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 13.3%13.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 3.8%3.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 8.3%8.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 34.3%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 27.7%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Speaker 27.2%, sitewide 6.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 21.5%, sitewide 19.2%Ad Hominem: Speaker 20.9%, sitewide 2.2%Horn Effect: Speaker 14.1%, sitewide 1.0%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 13.3%, sitewide 4.6%Loss Aversion: Speaker 11.9%, sitewide 2.5%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 9.1%False Dilemma: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 1.5%Halo Effect: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos