Speaker summary
⁠71%1 analyzed article/video48 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chris Cerino results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Personal Incredulity, and Appeal to Authority, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 90.3% saturation with 65 hits. Analysis detected 227.625 faulty-reasoning hits from 48 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 61.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠76% (6,868 of 28,364 speakers). This Chris Cerino is worse (more manipulative) than 75.80% of the peer group.
Chris Cerino
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 48
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

76% percentile
025507510075.8% percentile
61.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos48 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 90.3%90.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 80.6%80.6%Personal IncredulitySitewide 0.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 60.4%60.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 40.3%40.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 90.3%, sitewide 4.6%Halo Effect: Speaker 80.6%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 60.4%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 8.1%Personal Incredulity: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.2%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 40.3%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos