Speaker summary
⁠38%1 analyzed article/video82.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chris Canetti results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Begging the Question, and Status Quo Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 55 hits. Analysis detected 133 faulty-reasoning hits from 82.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 30.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠48% (14,785 of 28,364 speakers). This Chris Canetti is better (less manipulative) than 52.10% of the peer group.
Chris Canetti
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠48%Chris Canetti (selected)31%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 82.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

48% percentile
025507510047.9% percentile
30.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos82.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 20.9%20.9%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 20.9%20.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 29.1%29.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 29.1%, sitewide 11.1%Begging the Question: Speaker 20.9%, sitewide 1.7%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 20.9%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos