Speaker summary
⁠63%1 analyzed article/video102 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chris Boehm results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Negativity Bias, and Representativeness Heuristic, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 40.3% saturation with 75 hits. Analysis detected 225.258 faulty-reasoning hits from 102 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 19.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠31% (19,620 of 28,326 speakers). This Chris Boehm is better (less manipulative) than 69.30% of the peer group.
Chris Boehm
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 102
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

31% percentile
025507510030.7% percentile
19.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos102 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 40.3%40.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 33.9%33.9%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 15.6%15.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 30.6%30.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 4.8%4.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 4.8%4.8%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 4.8%4.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Anecdotal: Speaker 40.3%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 33.9%, sitewide 9.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 30.6%, sitewide 19.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 15.6%, sitewide 1.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 8.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 2.7%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos