Speaker summary
⁠64%2 analyzed articles/videos96 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chief Gene Harris results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Status Quo Bias, and Burden of Proof, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 71.8% saturation with 112 hits. Analysis detected 391 faulty-reasoning hits from 96 analyzed words across 2 videos, generating a BS Score of 25.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠41% (16,937 of 28,652 speakers). This Chief Gene Harris is better (less manipulative) than 59.10% of the peer group.
Chief Gene Harris
Speaker details
Total words: 96
Video count: 2
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

41% percentile
025507510040.9% percentile
25.1% BS Score2 analyzed videos96 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 71.8%71.8%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 32.0%32.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 54.5%54.5%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 16.7%16.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 12.2%12.2%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Speaker 11.5%11.5%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 11.5%11.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 15.4%15.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 13.5%13.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 11.5%11.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 71.8%, sitewide 11.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 54.5%, sitewide 26.9%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 32.0%, sitewide 2.2%Burden of Proof: Speaker 16.7%, sitewide 0.4%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 11.5%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 15.4%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 13.5%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Speaker 12.2%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Speaker 11.5%, sitewide 1.7%Primacy Effect: Speaker 11.5%, sitewide 0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos