Speaker summary
⁠78%1 analyzed article/video111 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cheryl Eddy results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Recency Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 30.6% saturation with 34 hits. Analysis detected 122 faulty-reasoning hits from 111 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 22% and a BS Rank of ⁠36% (18,281 of 28,364 speakers). This Cheryl Eddy is better (less manipulative) than 64.50% of the peer group.
Cheryl Eddy
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 111
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

36% percentile
025507510035.5% percentile
22.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos111 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 30.6%30.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 30.6%30.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 30.6%30.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 9.0%9.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 9.0%9.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Anecdotal: Speaker 30.6%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 30.6%, sitewide 11.1%Recency Bias: Speaker 30.6%, sitewide 2.7%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 9.0%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Speaker 9.0%, sitewide 6.9%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos