Speaker summary
⁠67%1 analyzed article/video51.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chelsa Moore results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Anecdotal, and Framing Effect, with False Dilemma as the most egregious example at 52% saturation with 30.659 hits. Analysis detected 154.659 faulty-reasoning hits from 51.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 34.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (13,218 of 28,364 speakers). This Chelsa Moore is worse (more manipulative) than 53.40% of the peer group.
Chelsa Moore
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 51.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

53% percentile
025507510053.4% percentile
34.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos51.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 72.2%72.2%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 52.0%52.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 31.7%31.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 31.7%31.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 12.2%12.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 31.7%31.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 12.2%12.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 72.2%, sitewide 7.5%False Dilemma: Speaker 52.0%, sitewide 1.5%Anecdotal: Speaker 31.7%, sitewide 5.2%Framing Effect: Speaker 31.7%, sitewide 26.9%In-Group Bias: Speaker 31.7%, sitewide 6.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 12.2%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 12.2%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos