Speaker summary
⁠80%1 analyzed article/video52.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Checkmarx results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Appeal to Authority, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 75% saturation with 39.375 hits. Analysis detected 179.375 faulty-reasoning hits from 52.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 65% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (6,436 of 28,364 speakers). This Checkmarx is worse (more manipulative) than 77.30% of the peer group.
Checkmarx
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 52.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

77% percentile
025507510077.3% percentile
65.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos52.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 7.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 11.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos