Speaker summary
⁠35%1 analyzed article/video185 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Check Point Research results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Overconfidence Bias, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 32% saturation with 56 hits. Analysis detected 155 faulty-reasoning hits from 185 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 16.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠26% (21,019 of 28,364 speakers). This Check Point Research is better (less manipulative) than 74.10% of the peer group.
Check Point Research
Speaker details
Total words: 185
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

26% percentile
025507510025.9% percentile
16.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos185 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 14.9%14.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 32.0%32.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 14.6%14.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 7.4%7.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 14.6%14.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Speaker 32.0%, sitewide 19.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 14.9%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 14.6%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 14.6%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos