Speaker summary
⁠98%1 analyzed article/video38 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Charls Sedgwick Hall results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Representativeness Heuristic, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 38 hits. Analysis detected 76 faulty-reasoning hits from 38 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠98% (751 of 28,364 speakers). This Charls Sedgwick Hall is worse (more manipulative) than 97.40% of the peer group.
Charls Sedgwick Hall
Speaker details
Total words: 38
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

97% percentile
025507510097.4% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos38 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos