Speaker summary
⁠53%1 analyzed article/video102.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Charles Kupchan results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Appeal to Emotion, and Pessimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 87 hits. Analysis detected 343.616 faulty-reasoning hits from 102.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 30.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠48% (14,044 of 26,884 speakers). This Charles Kupchan is better (less manipulative) than 52.20% of the peer group.
Charles Kupchan
Speaker details
Total words: 102.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

48% percentile
025507510047.8% percentile
30.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos102.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 41.3%41.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 39.1%39.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 32.2%32.2%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 16.1%16.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 23.0%23.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 10.9%10.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 41.3%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 39.1%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 32.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 23.0%, sitewide 11.1%Loss Aversion: Speaker 16.1%, sitewide 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 3.3%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos