Speaker summary
⁠58%1 analyzed article/video256 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Charles Jones results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Burden of Proof, Framing Effect, and Unattributed Quote, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 38.8% saturation with 160 hits. Analysis detected 722.264 faulty-reasoning hits from 256 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 15.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠23% (21,827 of 28,364 speakers). This Charles Jones is better (less manipulative) than 77.00% of the peer group.
Charles Jones
Speaker details
Total words: 256
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

23% percentile
025507510023.0% percentile
15.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos256 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 39.9%39.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 62.9%62.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 38.8%38.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 14.6%14.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 9.2%9.2%Special PleadingSitewide 0.3%Speaker 9.0%9.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 8.5%8.5%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 9.0%9.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 4.4%4.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 6.5%6.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Speaker 62.9%, sitewide 26.9%Burden of Proof: Speaker 39.9%, sitewide 0.4%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 38.8%, sitewide 3.7%Negativity Bias: Speaker 9.2%, sitewide 19.2%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 14.6%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 10.4%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 9.1%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 9.0%, sitewide 1.9%Special Pleading: Speaker 9.0%, sitewide 0.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 0.0%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos