Speaker summary
⁠50%1 analyzed article/video134.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Charles Davis results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Primacy Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 60.4% saturation with 122 hits. Analysis detected 235.75 faulty-reasoning hits from 134.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 21.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠35% (18,639 of 28,364 speakers). This Charles Davis is better (less manipulative) than 65.70% of the peer group.
Charles Davis
Speaker details
Total words: 134.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

34% percentile
025507510034.3% percentile
21.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos134.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 60.4%60.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 44.1%44.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 3.5%3.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 6.9%6.9%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Speaker 8.9%8.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Anecdotal: Speaker 60.4%, sitewide 5.2%Halo Effect: Speaker 44.1%, sitewide 6.7%Negativity Bias: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 15.9%Primacy Effect: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 0.9%In-Group Bias: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 6.9%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos