Speaker summary
⁠52%1 analyzed article/video97.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Charles Burnham results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Quote-first Misdirection, and Special Pleading, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 45% saturation with 72 hits. Analysis detected 240 faulty-reasoning hits from 97.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 17.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠28% (20,118 of 27,710 speakers). This Charles Burnham is better (less manipulative) than 72.60% of the peer group.
Charles Burnham
Speaker details
Total words: 97.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

27% percentile
025507510027.4% percentile
17.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos97.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 38.5%38.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 22.5%22.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 45.0%45.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 13.1%13.1%Special PleadingSitewide 0.3%Speaker 13.1%13.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 8.1%8.1%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 12.5%12.5%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 8.1%8.1%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 6.9%6.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 8.1%8.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 45.0%, sitewide 26.9%Straw Man: Speaker 38.5%, sitewide 0.9%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 22.5%, sitewide 3.7%Negativity Bias: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 19.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 13.1%, sitewide 0.0%Special Pleading: Speaker 13.1%, sitewide 0.3%Begging the Question: Speaker 12.5%, sitewide 1.7%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 5.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos