Speaker summary
⁠69%2 analyzed articles/videos148 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chad Marlow results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Confirmation Bias, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 39.1% saturation with 76.83 hits. Analysis detected 551.835 faulty-reasoning hits from 148 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 15.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠24% (21,738 of 28,364 speakers). This Chad Marlow is better (less manipulative) than 76.60% of the peer group.
Chad Marlow
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 148
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

23% percentile
025507510023.4% percentile
15.5% BS Score2 analyzed videos148 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 39.1%39.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 29.7%29.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 21.8%21.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 19.2%19.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 12.0%12.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 16.1%16.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 19.2%19.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 12.0%12.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 8.7%8.7%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Speaker 7.9%7.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 39.1%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 29.7%, sitewide 7.5%Framing Effect: Speaker 27.1%, sitewide 26.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 21.8%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity Bias: Speaker 12.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 19.2%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 19.2%, sitewide 4.6%Optimism Bias: Speaker 16.1%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 12.2%, sitewide 8.1%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 12.0%, sitewide 1.1%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 5.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 1.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos