Speaker summary
⁠57%3 analyzed articles/videos144 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chad Maisel results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 29% saturation with 43.848 hits. Analysis detected 259.696 faulty-reasoning hits from 144 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 26.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠43% (16,279 of 28,364 speakers). This Chad Maisel is better (less manipulative) than 57.40% of the peer group.
Chad Maisel
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 144
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

43% percentile
025507510042.6% percentile
26.3% BS Score3 analyzed videos144 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 25.0%25.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 29.0%29.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 25.0%25.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 25.0%25.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 25.0%25.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 29.0%29.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 29.0%, sitewide 26.9%In-Group Bias: Speaker 29.0%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos