Speaker summary
⁠98%1 analyzed article/video24 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Central California Conference results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Begging the Question, Framing Effect, and Indoctrination, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 24 hits. Analysis detected 96 faulty-reasoning hits from 24 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠98% (721 of 28,364 speakers). This Central California Conference is worse (more manipulative) than 97.50% of the peer group.
Central California Conference
Speaker details
Total words: 24
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

98% percentile
025507510097.5% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos24 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.8%Begging the Question: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.7%Framing Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 26.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos