Speaker summary
⁠98%1 analyzed article/video42.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Center for Universal Education at Brookings results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, Negativity Bias, and Pessimism Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 30 hits. Analysis detected 115 faulty-reasoning hits from 42.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 63.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠77% (6,148 of 25,929 speakers). This Center for Universal Education at Brookings is worse (more manipulative) than 76.30% of the peer group.
Center for Universal Education at Brookings
Speaker details
Total words: 42.5
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

76% percentile
025507510076.3% percentile
63.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos42.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 100.0%100.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 54.5%54.5%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 45.5%45.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 54.5%54.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.5%False Dilemma: Speaker 54.5%, sitewide 1.5%Negativity Bias: Speaker 54.5%, sitewide 19.2%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 45.5%, sitewide 1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos