Speaker summary
⁠79%3 analyzed articles/videos139 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Center for Immigration Studies results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Biased Writer Voice, and Representativeness Heuristic, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 28.8% saturation with 40 hits. Analysis detected 288 faulty-reasoning hits from 139 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 25.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠42% (16,466 of 28,364 speakers). This Center for Immigration Studies is better (less manipulative) than 58.10% of the peer group.
Center for Immigration Studies
Speaker details
Total words: 139
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

42% percentile
025507510041.9% percentile
25.9% BS Score3 analyzed videos139 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 28.8%28.8%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 28.8%28.8%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Speaker 25.2%25.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 28.8%28.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 28.8%28.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 25.2%25.2%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 20.9%20.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 20.9%20.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 28.8%, sitewide 0.8%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 28.8%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 28.8%, sitewide 5.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 28.8%, sitewide 1.9%In-Group Bias: Speaker 25.2%, sitewide 6.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 25.2%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 20.9%, sitewide 11.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 20.9%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos