Speaker summary
50%3 analyzed articles/videos389.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Celinda Lake results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Bandwagon, and Representativeness Heuristic, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 16% saturation with 71.379 hits. Analysis detected 644.246 faulty-reasoning hits from 389.667 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.2% and a BS Rank of 6% (26,676 of 28,364 speakers). This Celinda Lake is better (less manipulative) than 94.00% of the peer group.
Celinda Lake
Speaker details
Total words: 389.667
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

6% percentile
02550751006.0% percentile
7.2% BS Score3 analyzed videos389.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 6.0%6.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 6.5%6.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 6.5%6.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 16.0%16.0%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 8.7%8.7%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Speaker 8.8%8.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 6.2%6.2%Composition/DivisionSitewide 0.2%Speaker 5.0%5.0%Middle GroundSitewide 0.1%Speaker 4.8%4.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 4.7%4.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 16.0%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 15.7%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 10.6%, sitewide 7.5%Bandwagon: Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 3.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 0.8%Optimism Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 6.0%Composition/Division: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 0.2%Middle Ground: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 0.1%Primacy Effect: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 0.0%Indoctrination: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos