Speaker summary
50% 3 analyzed articles/videos 389.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Celinda Lake results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Bandwagon , and Representativeness Heuristic , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 16% saturation with 71.379 hits . Analysis detected 644.246 faulty-reasoning hits from 389.667 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.2% and a BS Rank of 6% (26,676 of 28,364 speakers). This Celinda Lake is better (less manipulative) than 94.00% of the peer group. Celinda Lake
Speaker details
Total words: 389.667
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.0% percentile 7.2% BS Score3 analyzed videos389.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 6.0% 6.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 6.5% 6.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 6.5% 6.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 16.0% 16.0% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 8.7% 8.7% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 8.8% 8.8% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 6.2% 6.2% Composition/Division Sitewide 0.2% Speaker 5.0% 5.0% Middle Ground Sitewide 0.1% Speaker 4.8% 4.8% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 4.7% 4.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 16.0%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 15.7%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 10.6%, sitewide 7.5% Bandwagon: Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 2.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 0.8% Optimism Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Composition/Division: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 0.2% Middle Ground: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 0.1% Primacy Effect: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 0.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 0.0% Indoctrination: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst