Speaker summary
⁠72%2 analyzed articles/videos359 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cecilia Rikap results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Unattributed Quote, and Framing Effect, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 45.6% saturation with 312 hits. Analysis detected 763.33 faulty-reasoning hits from 359 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 18.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠29% (19,010 of 26,780 speakers). This Cecilia Rikap is better (less manipulative) than 71.00% of the peer group.
Cecilia Rikap
Speaker details
Total words: 359
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

29% percentile
025507510029.0% percentile
18.6% BS Score2 analyzed videos359 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 45.6%45.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 37.8%37.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 40.0%40.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 7.9%7.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 6.3%6.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 2.3%2.3%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 6.3%6.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 2.3%2.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 45.6%, sitewide 8.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 40.0%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 37.8%, sitewide 1.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 3.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos