Speaker summary
ā 46%1 analyzed article/video54 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cecilia Laschi results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Appeal to Authority, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 54 hits. Analysis detected 54 faulty-reasoning hits from 54 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ā 98% (705 of 28,364 speakers). This Cecilia Laschi is worse (more manipulative) than 97.50% of the peer group.
Cecilia Laschi
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
ā 0%The Brookings Institution1%
ā 0%Gen Jack Keane1%
ā 0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
ā 0%Mike Muse1%
ā 0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
ā 98%Cecilia Laschi (selected)100%
ā 100%4MATIV100%
ā 100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
ā 100%314 Action Fund100%
ā 100%21 Grams100%
ā 100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 54
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

98% percentile
025507510097.5% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos54 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0ā€“125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos