Speaker summary
⁠65%3 analyzed articles/videos350.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cecilia Aguiar-Curry results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 25.5% saturation with 162 hits. Analysis detected 1,029.545 faulty-reasoning hits from 350.333 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 17.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠27% (19,812 of 27,011 speakers). This Cecilia Aguiar-Curry is better (less manipulative) than 73.30% of the peer group.
Cecilia Aguiar-Curry
Speaker details
Total words: 350.333
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

27% percentile
025507510026.7% percentile
17.3% BS Score3 analyzed videos350.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 37.2%37.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 25.5%25.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 29.8%29.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 36.0%36.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 12.6%12.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 25.5%25.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 6.1%6.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 5.8%5.8%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 6.1%6.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 8.3%8.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 37.2%, sitewide 4.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 36.0%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 29.8%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 25.5%, sitewide 19.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 25.5%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Speaker 12.6%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 11.1%Indoctrination: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 0.0%Slippery Slope: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 1.1%False Dilemma: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos