Speaker summary
⁠68%1 analyzed article/video143 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cecelia Sykes results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Fundamental Attribution Error, and Negativity Bias, with Actor-Observer Bias as the most egregious example at 28% saturation with 40 hits. Analysis detected 240 faulty-reasoning hits from 143 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 28% and a BS Rank of ⁠45% (15,609 of 28,364 speakers). This Cecelia Sykes is better (less manipulative) than 55.00% of the peer group.
Cecelia Sykes
Speaker details
Total words: 143
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

45% percentile
025507510045.0% percentile
28.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos143 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 28.0%28.0%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide 0.6%Speaker 28.0%28.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 28.0%28.0%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 28.0%28.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 28.0%28.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 28.0%28.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 28.0%, sitewide 0.6%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 28.0%, sitewide 15.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 28.0%, sitewide 2.7%Negativity Bias: Speaker 28.0%, sitewide 19.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 28.0%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 28.0%, sitewide 1.1%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos