Speaker summary
⁠98%1 analyzed article/video30 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cavalier Johnson results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Composition/Division, and Halo Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 30 hits. Analysis detected 90 faulty-reasoning hits from 30 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 35.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (12,964 of 28,364 speakers). This Cavalier Johnson is worse (more manipulative) than 54.30% of the peer group.
Cavalier Johnson
Speaker details
Total words: 30
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

54% percentile
025507510054.3% percentile
35.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos30 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Composition/DivisionSitewide 0.2%Speaker 25.0%25.0%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Speaker 25.0%25.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 25.0%25.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 25.0%25.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 25.0%25.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 25.0%25.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Optimism Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 15.9%Composition/Division: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 0.2%Halo Effect: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 3.3%Primacy Effect: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 0.9%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos