Speaker summary
⁠98%1 analyzed article/video100.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Catherine Pegard results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Pessimism Bias, and Unattributed Quote, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 91% saturation with 91.5 hits. Analysis detected 214.875 faulty-reasoning hits from 100.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠71% (8,231 of 28,364 speakers). This Catherine Pegard is worse (more manipulative) than 71.00% of the peer group.
Catherine Pegard
Speaker details
Total words: 100.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

71% percentile
025507510071.0% percentile
50.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos100.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 91.0%91.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 17.9%17.9%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 17.9%17.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 91.0%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 19.2%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 17.9%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 17.9%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos