Speaker summary
⁠73%1 analyzed article/video129 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Catherine Morris results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Availability Heuristic, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 26.2% saturation with 45 hits. Analysis detected 221 faulty-reasoning hits from 129 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 14% and a BS Rank of ⁠20% (21,487 of 26,730 speakers). This Catherine Morris is better (less manipulative) than 80.40% of the peer group.
Catherine Morris

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

20% percentile
025507510019.6% percentile
14.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos129 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 25.0%25.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 22.1%22.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 7.6%7.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 26.2%26.2%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 11.3%11.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 11.6%11.6%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 10.8%10.8%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 9.3%9.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 6.4%6.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 9.3%9.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 26.2%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 22.1%, sitewide 9.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 19.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 11.6%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Speaker 10.8%, sitewide 2.7%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 9.3%, sitewide 8.1%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 9.3%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos