Speaker summary
⁠50%1 analyzed article/video88 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Casey Whittier results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, False Dilemma, and Negativity Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 54 hits. Analysis detected 174 faulty-reasoning hits from 88 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 41.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (11,501 of 28,364 speakers). This Casey Whittier is worse (more manipulative) than 59.50% of the peer group.
Casey Whittier
Speaker details
Total words: 88
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

60% percentile
025507510059.5% percentile
41.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos88 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 66.7%66.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 33.3%33.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 16.7%16.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 66.7%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 6.7%False Dilemma: Speaker 33.3%, sitewide 1.5%Negativity Bias: Speaker 16.7%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos