Speaker summary
64%1 analyzed article/video105 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Casey Burgat results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Begging the Question, Quote-first Misdirection, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 97.1% saturation with 136 hits. Analysis detected 280 faulty-reasoning hits from 105 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 33.3% and a BS Rank of 52% (13,791 of 28,364 speakers). This Casey Burgat is worse (more manipulative) than 51.40% of the peer group.
Casey Burgat
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 105
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

51% percentile
025507510051.4% percentile
33.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos105 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 97.1%97.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 47.1%47.1%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 47.1%47.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 2.9%2.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 2.9%2.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 97.1%, sitewide 11.1%Begging the Question: Speaker 47.1%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 47.1%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 15.9%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos