Speaker summary
⁠74%1 analyzed article/video61 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cascadia Wildlands results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 82.5% saturation with 66 hits. Analysis detected 228.373 faulty-reasoning hits from 61 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 48.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠64% (10,365 of 28,364 speakers). This Cascadia Wildlands is worse (more manipulative) than 63.50% of the peer group.
Cascadia Wildlands
Speaker details
Total words: 61
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

64% percentile
025507510063.5% percentile
48.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos61 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 82.5%82.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 59.0%59.0%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 54.5%54.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 46.5%46.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 22.5%22.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 22.5%22.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 82.5%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Speaker 59.0%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 54.5%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 46.5%, sitewide 0.0%Framing Effect: Speaker 22.5%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 22.5%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos