Speaker summary
⁠35%1 analyzed article/video421.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Carter Sherman results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Optimism Bias, and Primacy Effect, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 49.763 hits. Analysis detected 206.494 faulty-reasoning hits from 421.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠2% (27,917 of 28,364 speakers). This Carter Sherman is better (less manipulative) than 98.40% of the peer group.
Carter Sherman
Speaker details
Total words: 421.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

2% percentile
02550751001.6% percentile
4.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos421.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 11.8%11.8%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Speaker 5.0%5.0%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Speaker 5.0%5.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 0.9%0.9%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 0.7%0.7%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 3.5%3.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 6.0%6.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 1.4%1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 0.9%0.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 6.0%6.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 3.7%Anecdotal: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 6.0%Primacy Effect: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 0.9%Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 0.3%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos