Speaker summary
⁠98%1 analyzed article/video43.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Caroline Taylor results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 43.5 hits. Analysis detected 72.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 43.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 75% and a BS Rank of ⁠82% (5,347 of 28,364 speakers). This Caroline Taylor is worse (more manipulative) than 81.20% of the peer group.
Caroline Taylor
Speaker details
Total words: 43.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

81% percentile
025507510081.2% percentile
75.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos43.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos