Speaker summary
29% 1 analyzed article/video 433.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Carol Ruckdeschel results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias , Slippery Slope , and Ambiguity (Equivocation) , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 13.6% saturation with 101 hits . Analysis detected 742 faulty-reasoning hits from 433.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.6% and a BS Rank of 4% (27,433 of 28,364 speakers). This Carol Ruckdeschel is better (less manipulative) than 96.70% of the peer group. Carol Ruckdeschel
Speaker details
Total words: 433.667
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 3.3% percentile 5.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos433.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 3.9% 3.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 6.5% 6.5% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 12.5% 12.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 2.3% 2.3% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 9.7% 9.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 7.5% 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 7.0% 7.0% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Nature Sitewide 0.2% Speaker 3.4% 3.4% No True Scotsman Sitewide 0.1% Speaker 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 13.6%, sitewide 15.9% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 12.5%, sitewide 1.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Slippery Slope: Speaker 9.7%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 0.8% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 3.7% Appeal to Nature: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 0.2% No True Scotsman: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 0.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst