Speaker summary
⁠48%1 analyzed article/video60 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Carol Acevedo results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Loss Aversion, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 45% saturation with 36 hits. Analysis detected 112 faulty-reasoning hits from 60 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 28% and a BS Rank of ⁠45% (15,595 of 28,364 speakers). This Carol Acevedo is better (less manipulative) than 55.00% of the peer group.
Carol Acevedo
Speaker details
Total words: 60
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

45% percentile
025507510045.0% percentile
28.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos60 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 37.5%37.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 45.0%45.0%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 22.5%22.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 12.5%12.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 22.5%22.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 45.0%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 37.5%, sitewide 6.7%Loss Aversion: Speaker 22.5%, sitewide 2.5%Negativity Bias: Speaker 22.5%, sitewide 19.2%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 12.5%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos