Speaker summary
⁠81%1 analyzed article/video35 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Carlos Morales results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, In-Group Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 81.5% saturation with 28.508 hits. Analysis detected 128.524 faulty-reasoning hits from 35 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 38.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (12,197 of 28,364 speakers). This Carlos Morales is worse (more manipulative) than 57.00% of the peer group.
Carlos Morales
Speaker details
Total words: 35
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

57% percentile
025507510057.0% percentile
38.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos35 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 81.5%81.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 62.9%62.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 37.1%37.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 37.1%37.1%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Speaker 25.8%25.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 12.9%12.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 12.9%12.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 81.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 62.9%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Speaker 37.1%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Speaker 37.1%, sitewide 6.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 25.8%, sitewide 1.4%Anecdotal: Speaker 12.9%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 12.9%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos