Speaker summary
⁠73%1 analyzed article/video111.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Carl Schmid results contain 13 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Begging the Question, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 39.6% saturation with 41.186 hits. Analysis detected 315.847 faulty-reasoning hits from 111.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 21.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠35% (18,699 of 28,364 speakers). This Carl Schmid is better (less manipulative) than 65.90% of the peer group.
Carl Schmid
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 111.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

34% percentile
025507510034.1% percentile
21.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos111.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 30.3%30.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 23.8%23.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 39.6%39.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 27.1%27.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 18.9%18.9%Tu QuoqueSitewide 0.2%Speaker 15.1%15.1%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 16.0%16.0%Special PleadingSitewide 0.3%Speaker 13.1%13.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 10.7%10.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 24.1%24.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Speaker 39.6%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Speaker 32.8%, sitewide 26.9%Begging the Question: Speaker 30.3%, sitewide 1.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 27.1%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 24.1%, sitewide 15.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 23.8%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 18.9%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Speaker 16.0%, sitewide 1.5%Tu Quoque: Speaker 15.1%, sitewide 0.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 13.1%, sitewide 11.1%Special Pleading: Speaker 13.1%, sitewide 0.3%Indoctrination: Speaker 10.7%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Speaker 10.7%, sitewide 6.0%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos