Speaker summary
⁠48%1 analyzed article/video225 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Carl Lepper results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Quote-first Misdirection, and Availability Heuristic, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 48.1% saturation with 175 hits. Analysis detected 543.116 faulty-reasoning hits from 225 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 18.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠30% (19,309 of 27,529 speakers). This Carl Lepper is better (less manipulative) than 70.10% of the peer group.
Carl Lepper
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 225
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

30% percentile
025507510029.9% percentile
18.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos225 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 44.8%44.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 48.1%48.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 18.7%18.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 7.1%7.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 13.7%13.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 6.9%6.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 5.0%5.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 7.3%7.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 48.1%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Speaker 44.8%, sitewide 5.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 18.7%, sitewide 0.0%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 13.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 8.1%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 3.3%Halo Effect: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos