Speaker summary
⁠98%1 analyzed article/video33 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Carl Bernstein results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Bandwagon, and Confirmation Bias, with Anchoring Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 33 hits. Analysis detected 165 faulty-reasoning hits from 33 analyzed words across 1 video, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠98% (654 of 28,364 speakers). This Carl Bernstein is worse (more manipulative) than 97.70% of the peer group.
Carl Bernstein
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 33
Video count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

98% percentile
025507510097.7% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos33 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 4.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Bandwagon: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 2.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos