Speaker summary
⁠74%1 analyzed article/video375.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Camilo Durana results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Hasty Generalization, and Self-Serving Bias, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 32.6% saturation with 122.551 hits. Analysis detected 760.828 faulty-reasoning hits from 375.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 11.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠15% (24,343 of 28,364 speakers). This Camilo Durana is better (less manipulative) than 85.80% of the peer group.
Camilo Durana
Speaker details
Total words: 375.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

14% percentile
025507510014.2% percentile
11.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos375.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 32.6%32.6%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 20.6%20.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 18.6%18.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 20.5%20.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 11.8%11.8%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Speaker 7.3%7.3%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 7.5%7.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 11.8%11.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 9.7%9.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 7.8%7.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 32.6%, sitewide 7.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 20.6%, sitewide 0.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 20.5%, sitewide 8.1%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 18.6%, sitewide 3.7%Halo Effect: Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 9.7%, sitewide 6.0%Begging the Question: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 1.7%Circular Reasoning: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 0.1%Anecdotal: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 5.2%Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 0.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos