Speaker summary
⁠68%1 analyzed article/video54 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cameron Khansarinia results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Indoctrination, and In-Group Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 82.1% saturation with 43.923 hits. Analysis detected 201.932 faulty-reasoning hits from 54 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 57.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (7,375 of 28,364 speakers). This Cameron Khansarinia is worse (more manipulative) than 74.00% of the peer group.
Cameron Khansarinia
Speaker details
Total words: 54
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

74% percentile
025507510074.0% percentile
57.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos54 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 82.1%82.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 66.0%66.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 66.0%66.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 66.0%66.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 32.1%32.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 32.1%32.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 82.1%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 66.0%, sitewide 26.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 66.0%, sitewide 0.0%In-Group Bias: Speaker 66.0%, sitewide 6.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 32.1%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 32.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos